The Core(anic) Problem with Obama’s Islamist Policy
“Benghazi did not happen in a vacuum,” Mrs. Clinton said. “The Arab revolutions have scrambled power dynamics and shattered security forces across the region.” WSJ 1/24/13
Can you believe it? Blame for the Benghazi attack ultimately falls on the “Arab revolutions”. Talk about passing the buck, eh? (Or should I say “passing the dinar”?) Clinton refers to the so-called “Arab Spring” protests wherein, according to the mainstream media, freedom-desiring Arabs sought to throw off the shackles of dictatorship. To what extent those uprisings were legitimate protests against tyrants or merely Muslim Brotherhood contrivances remains to be seen.
More importantly, the statement reflects the continuing intransigence of the Obama Administration to publicly acknowledge the danger posed by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood movement and like-minded Koranic literalists. Further, Mrs. Clinton’s verbiage reflects the Obama Administration’s insistence that the “War on Terror” is over despite all evidence to the contrary. Exhibit “A”- four Americans murdered in Benghazi.
Will no one in our Government be held accountable for the failure of leadership leading up to Benghazi?